“The girl did not recognise him as her husband”: freedmen, sexual violence, and gendered authority after emancipation

[thumbnail of Open access]
Preview
Text (Open access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Barnes, E. M. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7873-7975 (2021) “The girl did not recognise him as her husband”: freedmen, sexual violence, and gendered authority after emancipation. American Nineteenth Century History, 22 (3). pp. 289-306. ISSN 1743-7903 doi: 10.1080/14664658.2021.2022476

Abstract/Summary

Historians have demonstrated that white men used sexual violence as a weapon of terror after the Civil War to re-establish and strengthen white supremacy. Freedwomen’s testimonies against this violence have also been analysed as a key site of resistance in which women crafted alternative narratives about race, gender, and freedom. Little attention has been paid to the roles freedmen played in these processes, however. This article examines two ways in which black men shaped understandings of sexual violence against black women in the Reconstruction period: as allies and as perpetrators. In doing so, this work adds critical nuance to understandings of sexual violence in the Reconstruction South.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/102330
Identification Number/DOI 10.1080/14664658.2021.2022476
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Humanities > History
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar