Explaining green bond issuance using survey evidence: beyond the greenium

[thumbnail of Beyond the Greenium_Named Version_Final.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Sangiorgi, I. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8344-9983 and Schopohl, L. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2150-3593 (2023) Explaining green bond issuance using survey evidence: beyond the greenium. The British Accounting Review, 55 (1). 101071. ISSN 0890-8389 doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2021.101071

Abstract/Summary

The paper examines the drivers and challenges of issuing green bonds from the perspective of green bond issuers. Using survey evidence of global issuers representing 29% of total green bond issuances, the research shows that reputational benefits, the market signalling power of green bonds and a desire to curb climate change are the main motives for green bond issuance. In contrast, insufficient market evolvement, and a lack of awareness and suitable green projects represent the biggest barriers for entry to the green bond market. Most respondents consider green bond issuance costs to be higher than those of comparable plain vanilla bonds, but acceptable due to the benefits they derive from green bond issuances. Among these benefits, respondents report higher levels of demand for green bonds, higher levels of investor engagement, diversification of their investor base and a strengthened internal commitment to sustainability. Issuers’ experiences vary regarding the pricing of green bonds – with 48% of respondents stating that their green bond funding costs are the same as for their plain vanilla bonds and 42% reporting lower green bond funding costs. Most issuers favour a standardisation of the definition of ‘green’ for determining which projects can be funded via green bonds.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/102056
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.bar.2021.101071
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > Finance and Accounting
Uncontrolled Keywords Green bonds; Greenium; Bond Issuance; Survey; Climate finance
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar