Rauta, V.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3870-8680
(2021)
A conceptual critique of remote warfare.
Defence Studies, 21 (4).
pp. 545-572.
ISSN 1743-9698
doi: 10.1080/14702436.2021.1994398
Abstract/Summary
This paper presents a conceptual critique of “remote warfare.” It argues that “remote warfare” is more of a trendy term than a robust concept. In support of this assessment, this paper makes two arguments. First, that there is a lack of clarity in the debate over what “remote warfare” is: namely, the literature is yet to explain what it entails. Second, that because of this lack of definitional specificity, we also lack an account of its analytical value: what intellectual leverage does it hold over existing terms making similar claims? The article discusses these points by expanding on the notion of “semantic field,” which it uses to assess how “remote warfare” contributes and is shaped by the broader conceptual confusion in the study of contemporary war and warfare.
Altmetric Badge
| Item Type | Article |
| URI | https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/101226 |
| Identification Number/DOI | 10.1080/14702436.2021.1994398 |
| Refereed | Yes |
| Divisions | Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Politics, Economics and International Relations > Politics and International Relations |
| Publisher | Taylor and Francis |
| Download/View statistics | View download statistics for this item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record
Download
Download