Three-level main-effects designs exploiting prior information about model uncertainty

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Tsai, P. W., Gilmour, S. G. and Mead, R. (2007) Three-level main-effects designs exploiting prior information about model uncertainty. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 137 (2). pp. 619-627. ISSN 0378-3758 doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2006.01.003

Abstract/Summary

To explore the projection efficiency of a design, Tsai, et al [2000. Projective three-level main effects designs robust to model uncertainty. Biometrika 87, 467-475] introduced the Q criterion to compare three-level main-effects designs for quantitative factors that allow the consideration of interactions in addition to main effects. In this paper, we extend their method and focus on the case in which experimenters have some prior knowledge, in advance of running the experiment, about the probabilities of effects being non-negligible. A criterion which incorporates experimenters' prior beliefs about the importance of each effect is introduced to compare orthogonal, or nearly orthogonal, main effects designs with robustness to interactions as a secondary consideration. We show that this criterion, exploiting prior information about model uncertainty, can lead to more appropriate designs reflecting experimenters' prior beliefs. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/10100
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.jspi.2006.01.003
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Biological Sciences
Uncontrolled Keywords Bayesian optimal designs, factor screening, orthogonal array, prior, information, projection, BAYESIAN VARIABLE-SELECTION, ROBUST
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar