Comparison of different ways of handling L-shaped data for integrating sensory and consumer information

[thumbnail of 33 - Asioli_etal.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Asioli, D. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2274-8450, Nguyen, Q. C., Varela, P. and Næs, T. (2022) Comparison of different ways of handling L-shaped data for integrating sensory and consumer information. Food Quality and Preference, 96. 104426. ISSN 0950-3293 doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104426

Abstract/Summary

Different approaches for handling L-shaped data are compared for the first time in a study conducted with Norwegian consumers. Consumers (n = 101) valuated eight different yoghurt profiles varying in three intrinsic attributes such as viscosity, particle size, and flavour intensity following a full factorial design. Sensory attributes, consumers’ liking ratings, and consumer attributes were collected. Data were analysed using two different approaches of handling L-shaped data: approach one used two-step Partial Least Square (PLS) Regression using L-shaped data including the three blocks such as sensory attributes, consumers’ liking ratings, and consumer attributes, while approach two was based on one-step simultaneous L-Partial Least Square (L-PLS) Regression model of the same three blocks of data. The different approaches are compared in terms of centering, step procedures, interpretations, flexibility, and outcomes. Methodological implications and recommendations for academia and future research avenues are outlined.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/100650
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104426
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development > Department of Agri-Food Economics & Marketing
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar