Rape, consent and a lie about fertility: R v Lawrance [2020] EWCA Crim 971

[thumbnail of R v Lawrance (Case Note).pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Krebs, B. (2020) Rape, consent and a lie about fertility: R v Lawrance [2020] EWCA Crim 971. Journal of Criminal Law, 84 (6). pp. 622-625. ISSN 1740-5580 doi: 10.1177/0022018320976662

Abstract/Summary

This is a case comment on R v Lawrance [2020] EWCA Crim 971 which held that a lie about fertility was not sufficiently closely connected to the performance of sexual intercourse so as to be able to negate consent under s. 74 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003. The case note argues that Lawrance demonstrates that the circumstances in which consent is vitiated can still turn on subtleties that are difficult to justify, such as whether a chosen method of contraception would prevent ejaculate from entering the body or just sperm.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/100411
Identification Number/DOI 10.1177/0022018320976662
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
Publisher SAGE
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar