In-group loyalty and the punishment of corruption

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Solaz, H. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3053-2123, de Vries, C. E. and De Geus, R. A. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3053-2123 (2019) In-group loyalty and the punishment of corruption. Comparative Political Studies, 52 (6). pp. 896-926. ISSN 1552-3829 doi: 10.1177/0010414018797951

Abstract/Summary

This study suggests that in-group loyalty, defined as the degree to which people favor their own group over others, undermines the punishment of corruption. We present evidence from two studies. First, we utilize a real-world corruption scandal involving the ruling party in Spain that broke during survey fieldwork. People exposed to the scandal withhold support from the incumbent, but in-group loyalty based on partisanship weakens this effect. Second, we explore in-group loyalty beyond partisanship through laboratory experiments. These experiments artificially induce group identities, randomly assign the group identity of candidates and shut down any instrumental benefits of in-group loyalty. The experimental evidence suggests that people support corrupt candidates as long as they share a group identity and are willing to sacrifice material payoffs to do so. Our findings have important implications. Most importantly perhaps, they suggest that candidates can get away with corruption by engaging in identity politics.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/100269
Identification Number/DOI 10.1177/0010414018797951
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Politics, Economics and International Relations > Politics and International Relations
Publisher Sage
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar